La rivista e il marketplace globale per gli appassionati di auto d’epoca, creati da appassionati.
La rivista e il marketplace globale per gli appassionati di auto d’epoca, creati da appassionati.
Some time ago we visited a very interesting man in the South of France whom we met through PreWarCar.com. This true professional had previously sent us beautiful drawings and renderings of his 1925 Salmson Grand Sport which he had made on the computer. Besides this, there was a wonderful video of the restoration process and the final result of the Salmson he had restored himself. You might already have seen or read about this beautiful car as we published an article called: What happens after you successfully buy or sell something at PreWarCar.com?
After talking to him, I asked myself the question: to what extent can we use modern (computer) technology for PreWarCars? I am aware this is a very broad subject. And let me be clear, the drawings and renderings our friend made from his Grand Sports were entirely and only for restoring and rebuilding his car. He is a well-known (modern) car designer and therefore this is part of his profession.
So the question is: to what extent can we use modern (computer) technology for our PreWarCars to keep our heritage on the road for future generations?
Take 3D printing, which can, for instance, be used to make new parts or create malls to make new parts. Of course, a benefit of this is that you can first scan and/or draw the original part after which you can modify/ adjust/ repair the part(s). But are we only “allowed” to use this technology to recreate old parts or also to “improve” parts for our PreWars? Is this the "new" craftmanship?
Let's take this to the next level. You can also use modern technology to build (new) PreWarCars exactly the way they were when they first came from the factory. If you would use the original factory drawings, would they then be “original” in your opinion? And what if in the future this would be the only way to preserve our heritage?
But you can also look at it from another perspective. We can ask ourselves the question whether it might be necessary to “copy” “original” PreWarCars to multiply them so they become, maybe, more affordable and accessible to a different target group (for instance youngsters). I think we all know a good example of the pur sang, originally from a well-known manufacturer starting with a B and ending with ugatti. And then we can also discuss electronic ignitions, fuel injection and other modern techniques. But that might be something for later.
Where do we draw the line of “original”? Maybe we should first ask ourselves the question: what is original? If we have a brand new PreWarCar which came straight from the factory, do you think it would be able to drive (without any modifications!)?
To what extent can we use modern (computer) technology for our PreWarCars to keep our heritage on the road for future generations?
Please comment below and give your opinion.
Words by the editor. Rendering by Steeve.
In a landscape of high costs and vanishing trade skills (in Australia at least), the use of laser scanning, computer modelling and simulation, and sand printing of moulds made these projects viable. They also assisted faithful reproduction and reduced project risk.
Modern technology can be utilised to efficiently recreate individual parts and evaluate assemblies, which result in more accurate reproductions. An example is 3D printed sand moulds for castings. The manufacture of the moulds may be high tech, but the result is a reproduction of great accuracy achieved at comparatively reasonable cost. Without using the most efficient tools available, more and more dynamic examples of our motoring heritage will fade away as static museum pieces.